🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions about the remarks made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often encourage nationalism. Some disappointment was understandable. Instead, he invoked the continued drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three players in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person sensibly had the lack of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that is as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive strength on both forehand and reverse side are more than enough to defeat the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, he is often overmatched. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious emergence of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite harsh limitation on his upside.

Fritz has achieved a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded to No 4 – and held the spot. But the next leap, competing against and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of American men winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply too much and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the All England Club last four in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, extending the run to the brink of frustration. When he finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to drop serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to use excessive energy to win it. Facing set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He prolonged the match twice on his second serve, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was fairly compelling evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never particularly appeared like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding virtually anyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he should shoulder the majority of the blame for America failing to produce a male major champion since Andy Roddick feels unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz told a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {